Ambrosia Software Web Board: 4th of July - Ambrosia Software Web Board

Jump to content

  • 7 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4th of July

#101 User is offline   Zortrium 

  • Crazed primate
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,191
  • Joined: 08-January 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The great intraweb, and maybe New England

Posted 20 July 2003 - 01:07 AM

Quote

Originally posted by moonunit4eva:
I'm not blinded by patriotism. Why wouldn't you want to support our president? It's not like Gore would have done a better job. Gore's an absolute scum bag. He would have been the next Clinton. Not to mention, Bush is going to spend his whole term cleaning up everything that everyone else had done wrong, so he's not going to be able to do any real good for the country.



Damn conservatives. Posted Image I agree with everything Trah said, with the exception that the economic plummet is entirely his fault. While he certainly didn't help much and I don't mind blaming him, the economy will have natural flucuations (sp?) regardless of leadership.

The "screw the UN" move, however, really bugs me. He's undermining the UN and basically declaring it worthless. It's turning out like the League of Nations - it's destined to fail when the superpowers abandon it.

------------------
Politicians are like roaches - it's not that they eat so much, it's just that they contaminate everything they touch.
It's all fun and games until a rampaging mod destroys half your account.
Commander of the AAS and Supreme Ruler of ZAP.

"Bad Avatara."
-- from the topic closings of Sundered Angel, Official Lektorian and founder of SONAH.

#102 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 21 July 2003 - 01:38 AM

Well, unfortunately, there's really just about nothing the UN can do, other than saying things like "Please don't do that." Police (which I think of the UN as a form of, for keeping countries in line rather than individuals) can enforce what they say because they are more powerful than the average criminals. The UN is very weak, militarily, so it has no way to force countries to do what it want them to do (which could also be taken as a good thing, lest somebody manage to get control of it and, therefore, the world).

------------------
"Humans are hicks."
- Paff's Law
It explains so much...

#103 User is offline   Trah 

  • King of the East
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,014
  • Joined: 06-January 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Posted 21 July 2003 - 09:22 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Mag Steelglass:
Well, unfortunately, there's really just about nothing the UN can do, other than saying things like "Please don't do that." Police (which I think of the UN as a form of, for keeping countries in line rather than individuals) can enforce what they say because they are more powerful than the average criminals. The UN is very weak, militarily, so it has no way to force countries to do what it want them to do (which could also be taken as a good thing, lest somebody manage to get control of it and, therefore, the world).



It would have much more power if the US went along with them. Now people can say the US didn't do what the UN said so why should I? The UN works only if people use it.

------------------
my [url="http://"http://home.ptd.net/~hart1"]Home Page.[/url] Now with a link farm, picture gallery, Australia section, and golf log.

#104 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 21 July 2003 - 08:56 PM

Precisely.

------------------
"Humans are hicks."
- Paff's Law
It explains so much...

#105 User is offline   Pufer 

  • Deadpan Orator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13,878
  • Joined: 03-August 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DC

Posted 21 July 2003 - 09:37 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Trah:
It would have much more power if the US went along with them. Now people can say the US didn't do what the UN said so why should I? The UN works only if people use it.



The US goes along with the UN more than just about any other country, and when there is a problem look who the UN comes running to: the good ol' US of A (I'm speaking of the crisis in Liberia here). In most matters the UN can say, "Please don't do that, because if you don't the Americans might...you know." and countries listen (because occasionally the US will go crazy and attack, backing up the UN). In this case, however, the UN had the full support of France who (if they saw fit) could have attacked us in support for the UN (we've justified many actions this way, of course we would have leveled France in order to use it for a storage area for all of that good Iraqi oil we'll be getting). If a peacekeeping force is being assembled many countries base their decisions on whether to send troops on whether or not America is sending some of her own best men.

You may be forgetting that the UN said that Iraq had to submit unconditionally to the weapons inspectors after the Gulf War, they didn't and refused to enforce what they said when Iraq refused, thus, by your own contention, they proved that the system didn't work, the US came forward and put the teeth back into the UN. Now if the UN says that they want inspectors in any other country, the country better damn well bend over and take it, or America will...you know.

-Pufer

------------------
"I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them" -Issac Asimov
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense." -The Buddha

#106 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 21 July 2003 - 11:53 PM

I know that there are fees that countries are supposed to pay to the UN, and the US hasn't paid its in years.

And I've heard a lot of stuff about the inspections in Iraq being a fiasco, with checking the same places repeatedly after they'd been cleared and finding everything acceptable again, so my guess for not cooperating would be the Iraqis that were running the storage depots and whatnot getting tired of it?

------------------
"Humans are hicks."
- Paff's Law
It explains so much...

#107 User is offline   Sundered Angel 

  • Invigilator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 7,372
  • Joined: 25-January 00
  • Location:New York, New York

Posted 22 July 2003 - 07:01 AM

The US goes along with the UN more than any other country? It's used it's Security Council veto something like 70 times, as opposed to, say, France, which has used its veto 2 times.

------------------
Sundered Angel,
The One and Only
Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy
Sundered Angel,
The One and Only

Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy

#108 User is offline   Pufer 

  • Deadpan Orator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13,878
  • Joined: 03-August 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DC

Posted 22 July 2003 - 09:22 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Mag Steelglass:
I know that there are fees that countries are supposed to pay to the UN, and the US hasn't paid its in years.



"The United States is today and has always been the largest financial contributor to the United Nations System."

Quote

Originally posted by Mag Steelglass:
And I've heard a lot of stuff about the inspections in Iraq being a fiasco, with checking the same places repeatedly after they'd been cleared and finding everything acceptable again, so my guess for not cooperating would be the Iraqis that were running the storage depots and whatnot getting tired of it?



The UN could place the whole team of inspectors permanantly in a storage depot just to watch the operations contained inside 24/7 and the Iraqi storage depot patrons would have to sit and take it by the terms set by the UN after the Gulf War. They had every right to "get tired of it" but they had no recourse (and Hussein's government should have assured that they cooperated fully with the inspectors, he didn't so he violated the terms).

Quote

Originally posted by Sundered Angel:
The US goes along with the UN more than any other country? It's used it's Security Council veto something like 70 times, as opposed to, say, France, which has used its veto 2 times.



That only explains what the US has done inside the UN itself and only proves conclusively that the US is more active than France in the Security Council.

-Pufer




------------------
"I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them" -Issac Asimov
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense." -The Buddha

#109 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 22 July 2003 - 09:42 PM

Looks like I was wrong about the contributions bit.

Regarding the inspections: keep in mind that there really is no such thing as "power." It's all imaginary. Individuals do what they want to do. They follow the laws because they don't want to get into trouble. They break the laws because they don't mind the risk of getting in trouble compared to completing whatever objective they have when they break it. In the case of the inspections, I would not be surprised if some of them had disobeyed orders from Saddam and the other folks up high on the old Iraqi food chain.

Also, it was the US that kept forcing the UN to do the inspections. From what I gathered during them, the UN would not have kept it up had the US not made them.

And, less of an argument and more of a pointing-out-flawed-logic type of thing: the use of more vetoes does not prove conclusively that the US was more active in the UN than France, it just proves conclusively that the US vetoed more things than France. France could theoretically have been more active in other ways, yadda yadda.

------------------
"Humans are hicks."
- Paff's Law
It explains so much...

#110 User is offline   Trah 

  • King of the East
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,014
  • Joined: 06-January 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Posted 22 July 2003 - 10:09 PM

Quote

Originally posted by hawk:
My point simply was that Moore is a liar himself.



What evidence is there of that?

------------------
my [url="http://"http://home.ptd.net/~hart1"]Home Page.[/url] Now with a link farm, picture gallery, Australia section, and golf log.

#111 User is offline   Sundered Angel 

  • Invigilator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 7,372
  • Joined: 25-January 00
  • Location:New York, New York

Posted 23 July 2003 - 05:40 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Pufer:
That only explains what the US has done inside the UN itself and only proves conclusively that the US is more active than France in the Security Council.

-Pufer



No, it simply proves conclusively that the US is more actively obstructive than France.

------------------
Sundered Angel,
The One and Only
Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy
Sundered Angel,
The One and Only

Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy

#112 User is offline   moonunit4eva 

  • Dommy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,728
  • Joined: 15-March 03
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:The Pursuit

Posted 23 July 2003 - 05:18 PM

I'm not going to argue over this...but, nobody really knows what's been going on. None of you have much info to back your sides up. Not enough proof on either side so. Once you get some unbiased proof, I'm sticking with my side.

------------------
Quote me as saying I was misquoted.
Whatever happens..happens.

#113 User is offline   hawk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 384
  • Joined: 04-August 01

Posted 24 July 2003 - 07:57 AM

Quote

Originally posted by moonunit4eva:
Gore's an absolute scum bag. He would have been the next Clinton.


He isn't as interesting as Clinton, yet would probably have made a better president.

------------------
I'll kill you.
YP17
[url="http://"http://taoistmonksquirrel.blogspot.com/"]My life[/url]
Tout que je voudrais est vivre la vie que j'aime.

#114 User is offline   hawk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 384
  • Joined: 04-August 01

Posted 24 July 2003 - 08:09 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Trah:
Ack. Just ack. I wish Deep Blue was here. He would make a great comment.
Back in the good 'ol days (before 2000) the US economy was high, the world liked us, we weren't in war. Supreme cout gives Bush the win. Economy plumits, his feeble attempts to stimulate it fail. 9/11. The world is behind us. Afganhistan goes fairly well. World still mostly supports us. Iraq. Majority of the world doesn't agree with us. Bush goes to the UN. Doesn't get what he wants. Says "screw you, we're going in anyway." World goes from support to hate. It is found that Bush lied about certain claims that got us to war. Where to now? Another un-just war in Iran or Korean?


The economy actually started going sour before Bush took office. I recall a particularly moronic letter to the Chicago Tribune shortly after election day that said, "Why is it that anytime a Bush gets close to the White House, the economy goes bad?" My point, however, is that reduced consumer confidence isn't a result of Bush, and probably not of everyone else.

The world wasn't behind us when we went to Iraq... oh well. I've said before that the military actions taken by the United States is up to the United States. International cooperation is all well and good, but it's not the job of the rest of the world, or the United Nations, to dictate to us how we may use our armed forces, something the rest of the world seems to believe they have the right to do.

Bush's line about uranium in the SOTUA is being vastly blown out of proportion, and has gone from being a possible intelligence error (though British intelligence maintains that it was true) to somehow being a fabrication, and the only basis for our removal of Hussein.

Read [url="http://"http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2003/07/Microscopicview.shtml"]this[/url] article by Steven den Beste.

Iran isn't "next", especially with North Korea heating up. The DPRK is a serious threat to the far east, especially since they are actively pursuing nuclear weapons and aren't keeping that a secret. Military operations to remove that capability would be entirely justified, IMO.

------------------
I'll kill you.
YP17
[url="http://"http://taoistmonksquirrel.blogspot.com/"]My life[/url]
Tout que je voudrais est vivre la vie que j'aime.

#115 User is offline   hawk 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 384
  • Joined: 04-August 01

Posted 24 July 2003 - 08:35 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Trah:
What evidence is there of that?


[url="http://"http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html"]This[/url] should give you a good picture.

------------------
I'll kill you.
YP17
[url="http://"http://taoistmonksquirrel.blogspot.com/"]My life[/url]
Tout que je voudrais est vivre la vie que j'aime.

#116 User is offline   Captaintripps 

  • Banter & Brawl Pope
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 22,374
  • Joined: 18-July 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NEW YORK CITY

Posted 04 July 2004 - 10:08 PM

Happy happy.

------------------
20 Class A Cigarettes
[url="http://"http://www.axesandalleys.danielbesterinc.com/Index/Issues/Axes%20&%20Alleys%202.pdf"]Axes & Alleys[/url] [url="http://"http://www.danielbesterinc.com"]Daniel Bester, Inc.[/url] [url="http://"http://www.fark.com"]Islamic Militant Website[/url]

#117 User is offline   Pufer 

  • Deadpan Orator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13,878
  • Joined: 03-August 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DC

Posted 05 July 2004 - 12:02 AM

Whee! Happy fourth, y'all. Posted Image

-Pufer

------------------
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” -The Buddha
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who said it, even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense." -The Buddha

#118 User is offline   GandalfDaddy 

  • And another one bites the dust. Another one down...
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,432
  • Joined: 28-April 03
  • Location:... Pyre of Fire

Posted 05 July 2004 - 12:41 AM

In Utah, they won't set off fireworks cause its on Sunday. Bastards.

------------------
It seems people have a taste for hell in the morning.
'It seems people have a taste for hell in the morning. ';
The sig revolution died! Now it's time to move onto the self promotion revolution.

#119 User is offline   Avatara 

  • Guardian
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 12,036
  • Joined: 05-July 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2004 - 12:56 AM

Bah, I was thinking up a reply to the first page of arguments, until I started noticing the dates.

------------------
"Its all fun and games until a rampaging robot destroys half of your city."
"Sometimes I get confused whether I'm posting on ATT or in the War Room. But then I remind myself: If it's moderators acting scatter-brained and foolish, then it's the War Room*.

*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel

#120 User is offline   Tanis Half-Halo 

  • Master Chief
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,261
  • Joined: 22-August 02
  • Location:Moorestown, New Jersey, The United States of America

Posted 05 July 2004 - 01:36 AM

Quote

Originally posted by TheRedeemer:
Your wrong. The world Loved Clinton. Even though he was a liar and he cheated on his wife, he was the best damn President the U.S has ever had. Bush is a dangerous, oil greedy war mongerer, who should never have been put into power.


Take it from me, Clinton is far from the best President we ever had. That moron let Bin Laden escape when we could easily have caught him.

Quote

I just don't see what gives America the God given right to push everyone else around. I'd love to see North Korea turn around to America and say 'You have stockpiles of Nuclear and Biological weapons, all can be ready to fire in under 45 minutes, and If you don't disarm in the next month, we will Invade you' It seems silly, but It's no different to what the Bush administration is doing at the moment, there just bullies, plain and Simple.


First off, we help police the world's trouble spots because we can. With the most money and greatest military, we're the perfect people for the job.

Secondly, who really cares if North Korea invades us? Our missiles alone could shoot them all down, and even if a few got past us, our F-18's, none of which has ever been destroyed in combat(Or was it F-16's?) could finish them off.

Thirdly, don't comment on US policy if you have no idea why they do what they do. Afghanistan was home to a terroristic and abusive regime that needed toppling. It was the base of a terror network that killed 3,000 of our citizens without warning. Iraq had WAMD and was also home to an abusive regime that killed hundreds of thousands.

<Edit> And uh, Tripps, what's with bringing all this crap up again?
------------------
Member of WORRPBOITAMPSH
[url="http://"http://halo.bungie.org/"]Official Halo Homepage[/url]
[url="http://"http://halo.bungie.org/misc/e32003trailermirrors.html"]Halo 2 E3 Trailer[/url]
[url="http://"http://www.despair.com/potential.html"]"Not everyone gets to be an astronaut when they grow up."[/url]

[This message has been edited by Tanis Half-Halo (edited 07-05-2004).]

[This message has been edited by Tanis Half-Halo (edited 07-05-2004).]
"Stop treating god like a fairy out of Peter Pan." - Nick Lancaster

Level 60 Human Arms/Fury Warrior on the Medivh Server - Sergeant
110.6 DPS, 21.95% critical hits, 4,322 armor(44% reduction), 4,739 health
300 First Aid, 300 Cooking, 300 Armorsmithing, 300 Mining, 226 Fishing, Handcrafted Mastersmith Girdle, Valor Boots/Chest/Legs/Gauntlets/Spaulders/Bracers/Helm, Arcanite Reaper, Myrmidon's Signet, Painweaver Band, Skullflame Shield, Mark of Fordring

#121 User is offline   lobf 

  • LifeKnight alt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,434
  • Joined: 19-September 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LA

Posted 05 July 2004 - 09:10 AM

I don't like participating in arguments like this, as it is generally clueless kids arguing with much more intelligent and well established older folks. I am trying to wait until I have a bit more depth of experience before I decide to get involved in a serious argument like this. Tanis Half Halo (I know this) is just repeating things that his parents say, like Trah. I mean no disrespect to either of you, but in reality, you don't know jack. I would like to touch upon one issue here, though.

Quote

Tanis said:
Take it from me, Clinton is far from the best President we ever had. That moron let Bin Laden escape when we could easily have caught him.


I assume that you are talking about the Yugoslavian situation (or do you even know? You may just be repeating anti-liberal things that you have heard around. It wouldn't surprise me. You've done it before). Clinton was offered Bin-laden, but it was in exchange for dealing with other terrorists. If you still have a head on your two shoulders, you would know that the US Government does -not- bargain with terrorists. That is just as much of a lie as anything Michael Moore says. It is a twist of the truth.

As I said before: I don't know anything. I am too young. I am now trying to gain some life experience before I decide that I am ready to say my real political beliefs. Tanis and Trah, you should do the same.



------------------
ATTs Official Newb, And Znorty's official Sidekick. "All hail fearless leader." [url="http://"mailto:lotsofblackflags@yahoo.com"]mailto:lotsofblackflags@yahoo.com[/url]lotsofblackflags@yahoo.com
Entellagintly Desined

#122 User is offline   Zortrium 

  • Crazed primate
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,191
  • Joined: 08-January 02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The great intraweb, and maybe New England

Posted 05 July 2004 - 01:37 PM

LOL u LooZErZ bSUh is ROXor!1!!

Actually, I just wanted to tell everyone that I almost fell out of my seat when I saw a four page topic "appear" overnight.

That is all.

------------------
Official Sidekick: lotsofblackflags
Me: "That's what I'm gonna name my kid. Gloreglabert Zhaschflatishey."
SA: "How about Eimlokkindisttopicnow?"
It's all fun and games until a rampaging mod destroys half your account.
Commander of the AAS and Supreme Ruler of ZAP.

"Bad Avatara."
-- from the topic closings of Sundered Angel, Official Lektorian and founder of SONAH.

#123 User is offline   Avatara 

  • Guardian
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 12,036
  • Joined: 05-July 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2004 - 01:58 PM

Exactly, it was like "what the hell happened while I was gone?"

------------------
"Its all fun and games until a rampaging robot destroys half of your city."
"Sometimes I get confused whether I'm posting on ATT or in the War Room. But then I remind myself: If it's moderators acting scatter-brained and foolish, then it's the War Room*.

*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel

#124 User is offline   The Journalist 

  • earstwhile
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,728
  • Joined: 13-December 01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:That one place in Nevada.

Posted 05 July 2004 - 02:12 PM

Trash Talk has lost its mind

------------------
Either heaven or hell has continuous background music. Which one you think it is says a lot about you.
Join[url="http://"http://www.stanford.edu/group/pandegroup/folding/"]Folding@home[/url] Team 35022
Hyperbole is the best thing ever!

#125 User is offline   lobf 

  • LifeKnight alt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,434
  • Joined: 19-September 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LA

Posted 05 July 2004 - 03:27 PM

That's how I felt. I don't think the ATT has ever had a more serious topic (except for some of the MotherLove accusation threads)

------------------
ATTs Official Newb, And Znorty's official Sidekick. "All hail fearless leader." [url="http://"mailto:lotsofblackflags@yahoo.com"]mailto:lotsofblackflags@yahoo.com[/url]lotsofblackflags@yahoo.com
Entellagintly Desined

Share this topic:


  • 7 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users