Ambrosia Software Web Board: The Smacklist - Ambrosia Software Web Board

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Smacklist

#26 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 07 October 2002 - 04:57 PM

Pat, why'd you destroy sigmadude?

Hmm. Looks like the Consortium has commited numerous offenses, while the NA has commited none...

------------------
"Typical Americanism. Somebody else does it so we have to do it wrong."

#27 User is offline   Blood Eagle 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 27-April 02

Posted 07 October 2002 - 05:32 PM

Quote

avatara is a cythera moderator! traitor!


True.

------------------
Disadvantage has its own advantages. - Commodore Vahrn La'harrh

#28 User is offline   Avatara 

  • Guardian
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 12,036
  • Joined: 05-July 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 October 2002 - 05:38 PM

Look, just because I have the power to ban you into oblivion doesn't give you the right to hijack this topic. Take any gripes or complaints somewhere else, and try to keep the discussion here on topic.

Is it possible for someone to delete all of those irrelevant posts?
"Sometimes I get confused whether I'm posting on ATT or in the War Room. But then I remind myself: If it's moderators acting scatter-brained and foolish, then it's the War Room*.

*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel

#29 User is offline   Avatara 

  • Guardian
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 12,036
  • Joined: 05-July 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 October 2002 - 05:41 PM

13:10 10/07/02
Rich Destroys Shadow.

17:09 10/07/02
Patrick Destroys sigmadude.

I notice a trend growing about the consortium picking on the UNSET. Perhaps we might be considering siding with the NA after all...

------------------
"I hate that! Your answers are always short, precise, and utterly useless!"
"Yes."
"Sometimes I get confused whether I'm posting on ATT or in the War Room. But then I remind myself: If it's moderators acting scatter-brained and foolish, then it's the War Room*.

*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel

#30 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 07 October 2002 - 06:10 PM

Wouldn't make for an exciting war (23:10), but oh well. They're certainly asking for it.

------------------
"Typical Americanism. Somebody else does it so we have to do it wrong."

[This message has been edited by Mag Steelglass (edited 10-07-2002).]

#31 User is offline   Dan-D-Man 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 183
  • Joined: 01-July 02

Posted 07 October 2002 - 09:58 PM

Just got an interesting message from Sigmadude (the Consortium pres), appologising for the Consortium attacks. (I think he sent it to all of us). So this puts us in a tight spot: How do we now attack consortium pilots on the smacklist without going to war with them?
There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.

#32 User is offline   Sargatanus 

  • Haruspex
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1,443
  • Joined: 21-April 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis MN

Posted 07 October 2002 - 10:24 PM

Simple: We show that the attacks we make on their pilots were provoked, i.e. we show them the smacklist and appropriate news bit. If they stiil protest then that's roughly equivelant to supporting piracy, which could pit us against them. Unfortunately for them, we have enough sway to severely tip the balance in their squabbles with the NA.

------------------
[url="http://"http://www.leapinglaughter.org"]Dig a little deeper[/url]
As below, so above.
4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L

Shameless advertisement

#33 User is offline   Pallas Athene 

  • Lame space monkey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,636
  • Joined: 27-February 00
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Omisha

Posted 08 October 2002 - 02:38 PM

Personally, I think we should void all retributions prior to sigmadude's apology, to demonstrate that "we don't want to go to war." However, when we officially get involved in galactic politics, no one will be surprised if we join the NA.

--
Relevant Changes:

Rich destroys DanMan (10/8/02)
Pallas Athene destroys Rich (10/8/02)

Should we even bother entering that one in? Posted Image

------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."

#34 User is offline   Dan-D-Man 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 183
  • Joined: 01-July 02

Posted 08 October 2002 - 03:50 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Pallas Athene:
Personally, I think we should void all retributions prior to sigmadude's apology, to demonstrate that "we don't want to go to war." However, when we officially get involved in galactic politics, no one will be surprised if we join the NA.

--
Relevant Changes:

Rich destroys DanMan (10/8/02)
Pallas Athene destroys Rich (10/8/02)

Should we even bother entering that one in?    Posted Image


Grr, I am pissed at the combat system. I had a buzzard with a shield capacitator and it only took 2 heavy rockets to kill me?? Doesn't seem right.

I am kind of mad that the consortium attacked after the appology (especially since it was me!!), so I think we should stand firm on our smacklist and inform Sigmadude that our policy is "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." I doubt he'll protest much, because he knows he'll be fighting a 2-front war if he provokes us to join the NA.

[This message has been edited by Dan-D-Man (edited 10-08-2002).]
There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.

#35 User is offline   Pallas Athene 

  • Lame space monkey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,636
  • Joined: 27-February 00
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Omisha

Posted 08 October 2002 - 05:13 PM

The only rockets/missiles/torps fired were two Heavy rockets. He may have had other weaponry onboard, but that wouldn't show up on the report.

Quote

Originally sent by Sigmadude:
I have threatened Rich with revoking his Consortium citizenship and hunting him as a political criminal if he does not answer for his attacks. The Consortium does not need another war on our hands, and we wish to maintain our friendship with the UNSET alliance.


Judging by this message, I think we have the Consortium very scared. As I said, I think we should offer to void all previous Consortium attacks and preserve our neutrality. It's still in our advantage to remain neutral - if we can secure Turok and Montar and establish defensive fleets, then we should attack. I'd put that at 1-2 weeks away.

However, if any more incidents occur, we're taking them out immediately.

------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."

#36 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 08 October 2002 - 05:23 PM

I've changed the consortium attacks to "has been voided, don't avenge this," so we can switch them back if the consortium continues to attack us.

[EDIT] More consortium attacks. link attacked MrMellow four times to successfully destroy him. Pallas, I think you should tell sigmadude that five more attacks (or something along those lines) will result in a declaration of war. [/EDIT]

------------------
"Typical Americanism. Somebody else does it so we have to do it wrong."

[This message has been edited by Mag Steelglass (edited 10-08-2002).]

#37 User is offline   Pallas Athene 

  • Lame space monkey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,636
  • Joined: 27-February 00
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Omisha

Posted 08 October 2002 - 05:50 PM

link destroys MrMellow, 10/8/02

After chasing 4 jumps, it's pretty clear that link wasn't just targeting "whoever came." I'll send a message to sigmadude informing him that negotiations have been suspended. So we can replace the "do not attack"s with "unavenged."

I think we should let members of the Consortium who haven't committed offenses join us - I'm sure they'll see that they don't stand much of a chance in the upcoming war.

[edit]Message sent. I offered the chance for current Consortium non-offenders to declare allegiance to either the UNSET or the NSF. With luck, by the time we actually start fighting, their numbers will be depleted and we'll be able to take them on without NA assistance.[/edit]

------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."

[This message has been edited by Pallas Athene (edited 10-08-2002).]

#38 User is offline   Pallas Athene 

  • Lame space monkey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,636
  • Joined: 27-February 00
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Omisha

Posted 09 October 2002 - 06:59 PM

Actually, we should put this to a vote. Cast your vote for:

1) Forgetting the Consortium's offenses
2) Punishing offenses, and declaring war if more are committed
3) Declaring war immediately and destroying them

After thinking, I think 2 is the best course of action. We don't want to be seen as the aggressors, but the war would be beneficial to us. If we can goad them into fighting back, we'll either get 1) Consortium offenders excommunicated [this is the official term now, used by both sigmadude and Shin], or 2) a war where the intelligent members leave, and we only have to fight stupid people.

------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."

#39 User is offline   Patrick 

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,121
  • Joined: 21-June 00

Posted 09 October 2002 - 07:22 PM

purely on the basis of realpolitik, I think it would be in our interest to completely annihilate the Consortium, then follow up by destroying the NA with our planet( and hence cash for fleet) advantage. Of course I'm sure that Consortium defense fleets would "accidentally" suddenly get a massive boost in power thanks to Beef and CheesEv if we were actually on the verge of conquering them.

Still, a war would be fun Posted Image

Hmm.. but if we defeat the Consortium space forces that leaves us with the N.A. which outnumbers us 2:1...hmm.

Just targeted attacks against offenders I think.

------------------
lala i need a sig...maybe i should put random snippets of code from my "undisclosed project" down here :P

#40 User is offline   Avatara 

  • Guardian
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 12,036
  • Joined: 05-July 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 October 2002 - 07:54 PM

I vote for 2. If they want to ruin our day, its only fair to hit them back.

------------------
"I hate that! Your answers are always short, precise, and utterly useless!"
"Yes."
"Sometimes I get confused whether I'm posting on ATT or in the War Room. But then I remind myself: If it's moderators acting scatter-brained and foolish, then it's the War Room*.

*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel

#41 User is offline   Mag Steelglass 

  • fogey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,768
  • Joined: 23-January 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR

Posted 09 October 2002 - 10:44 PM

I also vote for 2.

------------------
"Typical Americanism. Somebody else does it so we have to do it wrong."

#42 User is offline   Sargatanus 

  • Haruspex
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1,443
  • Joined: 21-April 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis MN

Posted 09 October 2002 - 10:59 PM

I vote for 2, but we should hold back on the war unless absolutely necessary.

------------------
[url="http://"http://www.leapinglaughter.org"]Dig a little deeper[/url]
As below, so above.
4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L

Shameless advertisement

#43 User is offline   Dan-D-Man 

  • Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 183
  • Joined: 01-July 02

Posted 09 October 2002 - 11:31 PM

My vote is for 2. It makes sense and it gives us time to build (fleets).

Quote

Originally posted by Patrick:
purely on the basis of realpolitik, I think it would be in our interest to completely annihilate the Consortium


Not sure if we could do that (just yet), but we might want to think about it, say, next week when we have a slightly larger navy. I figure the consortium navy won't be growing too fast because its tied up in a war with the NA, so we can probably catch up.

------------------
In the begining, there was EV. Single Player. Now, we have been delivered from isolation.
[url="http://"http://www.stonefire.net"] The Hideout[/url]: Multiplayer EV!!
There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.

#44 User is offline   Pallas Athene 

  • Lame space monkey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,636
  • Joined: 27-February 00
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Omisha

Posted 10 October 2002 - 02:32 PM

I'm going to review this and make a few comments...
[x-y-z] means x avenged attacks, y unavenged attacks, and z voided attacks.

Quote

Anakerie (Consortium) [0-1-0]
link (Consortium) [0-1-0]
deffdood (Consortium) [0-1-0]

These attacks should definitely be avenged. I have a go-ahead from sigmadude for targeted retribution, so we have a free hand once each. However, Deffdood is MIA, and link was recently killed; Anakerie may be the only target we kill in the near future.

Quote

Rich (Consortium) [1-1-0]

Apparently, the attacks were executed by a friend who didn't know that he shouldn't be targeting us. I think we should release him - he has been punished once already.

Quote

Wedge (Pirate) [1-1-0]

Wedge is considering joining the NSF. We should put any retribution against him on hold until after the weekend, when we can know which way he decided.

Quote

Beef (Pirate) [0-0-2]

I've yet to see him make good on his promise. We should put a deadline here - perhaps, 5 days for 1+ retribution, or else his voided attacks become reinstated.

Quote

Volkov (Pirate) [1-3-0]

To quote Volkov, "No problem, I'm just going to have to hunt your punk ass down." We're going to have to keep Volkov in check, since he seems to have an intense dislike for the UNSET.

Quote

Colin (Pirate) [0-1-0]

This one isn't really worth going out of our way for. If the opportunity presents itself, then we should avenge it, but colin seems to be a smaller independent, not an official pirate.

------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."

#45 User is offline   Avatara 

  • Guardian
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 12,036
  • Joined: 05-July 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 October 2002 - 02:39 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Pallas Athene:
Beef (Pirate) [0-0-2]
I've yet to see him make good on his promise. We should put a deadline here - perhaps, 5 days for 1+ retribution, or else his voided attacks become reinstated.


I don't think we officially accepted his offer, or that he knows we did, assuming we did. Perhaps you could talk to him to clear up any possible misconceptions.

Also, our 'retal' list is short on possible targets, most of them have either been destroyed recently or have not used their turn yet.

------------------
"I hate that! Your answers are always short, precise, and utterly useless!"
"Yes."

[This message has been edited by Avatara (edited 10-10-2002).]
"Sometimes I get confused whether I'm posting on ATT or in the War Room. But then I remind myself: If it's moderators acting scatter-brained and foolish, then it's the War Room*.

*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel

#46 User is offline   MrMellow 

  • Junior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 10-October 02

Posted 11 October 2002 - 10:41 AM

Ahh. I just re-registered for the boards (I used to lurk around the EV boards a while back). In 2-3 turns, I'll probably have a Raptor or a Goliath, so I can start exacting a little revenge on some pirates. But anyways, I was thinking of starting a message board on Bravenet, and then messaging the link to you guys on Hideout. That way we could have a more private board, and be able to openly discuss battle plans and all that good juicy stuff. Lemme know what ya think.

edit: Okay, I've got the forum up. I'm gonna password protect it, but I was wondering if I should give everyone in UNSET access to it, or just the Trustworthy Core Guys™?
------------------
"Stupidity is the building block of life."-Frank Zappa

[This message has been edited by MrMellow (edited 10-11-2002).]

#47 User is offline   Sargatanus 

  • Haruspex
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1,443
  • Joined: 21-April 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis MN

Posted 11 October 2002 - 02:03 PM

Basically everyone on these boards is a Core Guy™

------------------
[url="http://"http://www.leapinglaughter.org"]Dig a little deeper[/url]
As below, so above.
4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L

Shameless advertisement

#48 User is offline   Patrick 

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,121
  • Joined: 21-June 00

Posted 11 October 2002 - 03:47 PM

Is this bravenet a site with ads? if so then I could simply host it on the Ares Axis board instead(no ads Posted Image )
[url="http://"http://www.aresaxis.net"]www.aresaxis.net[/url]

#49 User is offline   MrMellow 

  • Junior Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 10-October 02

Posted 11 October 2002 - 05:05 PM

Yeah, there's ads unfortunately. If you want to host it on there, go for it. Ads get annoying real quick. Posted Image

------------------
"Stupidity is the building block of life."-Frank Zappa

#50 User is offline   Moonshadow 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 21-October 00
  • Gender:Female

Posted 11 October 2002 - 08:22 PM

You can mark one of lord_Demonthenes' attacks avenged, Avatara got his revenge.

Quote

Originally posted on the Hideout News:
UNSET Defense Fleet #1 Destroys lord_Demonthenes.
Current Positions

• UNSET Defense Fleet #1: Cruising around the Utopos system.
• lord_Demonthenes: lord_Demonthenes drifted in his/her escape pod until he/she reached the Quadros system.




------------------
Ich weiß wohl, ich bin nur ein Träumer, der vielleicht eines Morgens erwacht. Doch ich spotte dem Tag und ich folge dem Stern und ich lass mich entführen in die Nacht...
- Silk & Lute
I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users