The Smacklist
#28
Posted 07 October 2002 - 05:38 PM
Is it possible for someone to delete all of those irrelevant posts?
*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel
#29
Posted 07 October 2002 - 05:41 PM
Rich Destroys Shadow.
17:09 10/07/02
Patrick Destroys sigmadude.
I notice a trend growing about the consortium picking on the UNSET. Perhaps we might be considering siding with the NA after all...
------------------
"I hate that! Your answers are always short, precise, and utterly useless!"
"Yes."
*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel
#31
Posted 07 October 2002 - 09:58 PM
#32
Posted 07 October 2002 - 10:24 PM
------------------
[url="http://"http://www.leapinglaughter.org"]Dig a little deeper[/url]
As below, so above.
#33
Posted 08 October 2002 - 02:38 PM
--
Relevant Changes:
Rich destroys DanMan (10/8/02)
Pallas Athene destroys Rich (10/8/02)
Should we even bother entering that one in?
------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."
#34
Posted 08 October 2002 - 03:50 PM
Quote
Personally, I think we should void all retributions prior to sigmadude's apology, to demonstrate that "we don't want to go to war." However, when we officially get involved in galactic politics, no one will be surprised if we join the NA.
--
Relevant Changes:
Rich destroys DanMan (10/8/02)
Pallas Athene destroys Rich (10/8/02)
Should we even bother entering that one in?
Grr, I am pissed at the combat system. I had a buzzard with a shield capacitator and it only took 2 heavy rockets to kill me?? Doesn't seem right.
I am kind of mad that the consortium attacked after the appology (especially since it was me!!), so I think we should stand firm on our smacklist and inform Sigmadude that our policy is "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." I doubt he'll protest much, because he knows he'll be fighting a 2-front war if he provokes us to join the NA.
[This message has been edited by Dan-D-Man (edited 10-08-2002).]
#35
Posted 08 October 2002 - 05:13 PM
Quote
I have threatened Rich with revoking his Consortium citizenship and hunting him as a political criminal if he does not answer for his attacks. The Consortium does not need another war on our hands, and we wish to maintain our friendship with the UNSET alliance.
Judging by this message, I think we have the Consortium very scared. As I said, I think we should offer to void all previous Consortium attacks and preserve our neutrality. It's still in our advantage to remain neutral - if we can secure Turok and Montar and establish defensive fleets, then we should attack. I'd put that at 1-2 weeks away.
However, if any more incidents occur, we're taking them out immediately.
------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."
#36
Posted 08 October 2002 - 05:23 PM
[EDIT] More consortium attacks. link attacked MrMellow four times to successfully destroy him. Pallas, I think you should tell sigmadude that five more attacks (or something along those lines) will result in a declaration of war. [/EDIT]
------------------
"Typical Americanism. Somebody else does it so we have to do it wrong."
[This message has been edited by Mag Steelglass (edited 10-08-2002).]
#37
Posted 08 October 2002 - 05:50 PM
After chasing 4 jumps, it's pretty clear that link wasn't just targeting "whoever came." I'll send a message to sigmadude informing him that negotiations have been suspended. So we can replace the "do not attack"s with "unavenged."
I think we should let members of the Consortium who haven't committed offenses join us - I'm sure they'll see that they don't stand much of a chance in the upcoming war.
[edit]Message sent. I offered the chance for current Consortium non-offenders to declare allegiance to either the UNSET or the NSF. With luck, by the time we actually start fighting, their numbers will be depleted and we'll be able to take them on without NA assistance.[/edit]
------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."
[This message has been edited by Pallas Athene (edited 10-08-2002).]
#38
Posted 09 October 2002 - 06:59 PM
1) Forgetting the Consortium's offenses
2) Punishing offenses, and declaring war if more are committed
3) Declaring war immediately and destroying them
After thinking, I think 2 is the best course of action. We don't want to be seen as the aggressors, but the war would be beneficial to us. If we can goad them into fighting back, we'll either get 1) Consortium offenders excommunicated [this is the official term now, used by both sigmadude and Shin], or 2) a war where the intelligent members leave, and we only have to fight stupid people.
------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."
#39
Posted 09 October 2002 - 07:22 PM
Still, a war would be fun
Hmm.. but if we defeat the Consortium space forces that leaves us with the N.A. which outnumbers us 2:1...hmm.
Just targeted attacks against offenders I think.
------------------
lala i need a sig...maybe i should put random snippets of code from my "undisclosed project" down here
#40
Posted 09 October 2002 - 07:54 PM
------------------
"I hate that! Your answers are always short, precise, and utterly useless!"
"Yes."
*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel
#42
Posted 09 October 2002 - 10:59 PM
------------------
[url="http://"http://www.leapinglaughter.org"]Dig a little deeper[/url]
As below, so above.
#43
Posted 09 October 2002 - 11:31 PM
Quote
purely on the basis of realpolitik, I think it would be in our interest to completely annihilate the Consortium
Not sure if we could do that (just yet), but we might want to think about it, say, next week when we have a slightly larger navy. I figure the consortium navy won't be growing too fast because its tied up in a war with the NA, so we can probably catch up.
------------------
In the begining, there was EV. Single Player. Now, we have been delivered from isolation.
[url="http://"http://www.stonefire.net"] The Hideout[/url]: Multiplayer EV!!
#44
Posted 10 October 2002 - 02:32 PM
[x-y-z] means x avenged attacks, y unavenged attacks, and z voided attacks.
Quote
link (Consortium) [0-1-0]
deffdood (Consortium) [0-1-0]
These attacks should definitely be avenged. I have a go-ahead from sigmadude for targeted retribution, so we have a free hand once each. However, Deffdood is MIA, and link was recently killed; Anakerie may be the only target we kill in the near future.
Quote
Apparently, the attacks were executed by a friend who didn't know that he shouldn't be targeting us. I think we should release him - he has been punished once already.
Quote
Wedge is considering joining the NSF. We should put any retribution against him on hold until after the weekend, when we can know which way he decided.
Quote
I've yet to see him make good on his promise. We should put a deadline here - perhaps, 5 days for 1+ retribution, or else his voided attacks become reinstated.
Quote
To quote Volkov, "No problem, I'm just going to have to hunt your punk ass down." We're going to have to keep Volkov in check, since he seems to have an intense dislike for the UNSET.
Quote
This one isn't really worth going out of our way for. If the opportunity presents itself, then we should avenge it, but colin seems to be a smaller independent, not an official pirate.
------------------
"All truths are relative, except for this one."
#45
Posted 10 October 2002 - 02:39 PM
Quote
Beef (Pirate) [0-0-2]
I've yet to see him make good on his promise. We should put a deadline here - perhaps, 5 days for 1+ retribution, or else his voided attacks become reinstated.
I don't think we officially accepted his offer, or that he knows we did, assuming we did. Perhaps you could talk to him to clear up any possible misconceptions.
Also, our 'retal' list is short on possible targets, most of them have either been destroyed recently or have not used their turn yet.
------------------
"I hate that! Your answers are always short, precise, and utterly useless!"
"Yes."
[This message has been edited by Avatara (edited 10-10-2002).]
*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel
#46
Posted 11 October 2002 - 10:41 AM
edit: Okay, I've got the forum up. I'm gonna password protect it, but I was wondering if I should give everyone in UNSET access to it, or just the Trustworthy Core Guys™?
------------------
"Stupidity is the building block of life."-Frank Zappa
[This message has been edited by MrMellow (edited 10-11-2002).]
#47
Posted 11 October 2002 - 02:03 PM
------------------
[url="http://"http://www.leapinglaughter.org"]Dig a little deeper[/url]
As below, so above.
#50
Posted 11 October 2002 - 08:22 PM
Quote
UNSET Defense Fleet #1 Destroys lord_Demonthenes.
Current Positions
• UNSET Defense Fleet #1: Cruising around the Utopos system.
• lord_Demonthenes: lord_Demonthenes drifted in his/her escape pod until he/she reached the Quadros system.
------------------
Ich weiß wohl, ich bin nur ein Träumer, der vielleicht eines Morgens erwacht. Doch ich spotte dem Tag und ich folge dem Stern und ich lass mich entführen in die Nacht...
- Silk & Lute