Question on the Blazing Trails TS Timeline Or TSs and Time Periods
#1
Posted 10 July 2014 - 04:01 PM
As I recall, the original goal of the Blazing Trails and Rasmus TS timelines was twofold: first, to experiment with TSs set in a different time and, second, to focus more on Cythera-related characters with weaker abilities and to have said characters develop their abilities and personalities as the stories continued. Unfortunately, it never seemed to attract as much interest as the main TS stories.
Was this due to the overall downturn in activity or to some other factor? How viable are TSs set in different time periods? Should another attempt at creating a different timeline for TSs be attempted in the future or is it not worth the effort?
#2
Posted 10 July 2014 - 05:37 PM
#3
Posted 11 July 2014 - 08:34 AM
I know at the beginning of Blazing Trails I was pushing for a "lighthearted" TS, and I feel bad that by the time a silly TS got started in earnest, I really wasn't in it. GM gave me an outlet for silly stories, and it's just way easier to steal other peoples' established characters than to work on building new ones. However, I really enjoyed the new characters in R&Co, especially Princess Danae and Pelli :D
In hindsight, I wonder if the BT series would have been more active if it was serious. (Looking at the activity level in OoR, maybe not...) In my mind, the original goal of BT was to be more game-based and more true to the game. The fact that everyone had different goals in mind might not have helped anything, but thats typical of TSes, isn't it?
#4
Posted 17 July 2014 - 08:52 PM
#5
Posted 18 July 2014 - 05:08 AM
Selax, on 17 July 2014 - 08:52 PM, said:
Still sounds like you're jumping to conclusions. Why do you say that it diverged so severely, and why would that stop it from being successful? Right now, it seems unlikely that OoR will generate an an ending, let alone a sequel, so I don't think it's a fair point of comparison.
When you say "ending Rasmus", do you mean closing out R&C: Inquiries, or the entire timeline? If it's the former, then the aforementioned "and everyone went home and it was fine" works. If it's the latter, I don't see why it's important or even good to do.
#6
Posted 18 July 2014 - 08:56 AM
R&Co was intended to be the "tavern" topic for this series, but we never bothered making a new topic for the current adventure. Maybe you should split all the posts from this adventure into a new topic, bring us back to home base, lock the new topic, & leave R&Co open in case anyone wants to use it again :D That would give you plenty of moderatory tasks, right?
This series did diverge a lot from the game, which I kind of expected when Valy joined (because I don't think he's ever played Cythera?), but actually, it mostly diverged after he left. I think our original idea was too boring, so we got more creative with it. I wouldn't say it diverged more than the main TS series. And as Fiery said, OoR also is unlikely to generate a sequel.
Anyway, I think we got two good TSes out of this series, and that's a good thing ^_^
#7
Posted 18 July 2014 - 01:08 PM
#8
Posted 21 July 2014 - 07:58 PM
Pallas Athene, on 18 July 2014 - 05:08 AM, said:
When you say "ending Rasmus", do you mean closing out R&C: Inquiries, or the entire timeline? If it's the former, then the aforementioned "and everyone went home and it was fine" works. If it's the latter, I don't see why it's important or even good to do.
I'm counting the inclusion of non-Cytheran technologies and such as divergent from the game. (I confess to being as guilty as anyone of using these elements in Rasmus.) If adherence to the game was one of the goals of the TS, it was not successful in this area.
I don't plan to close out the entire timeline, just to lock Rasmus in the next week or two. Frankly, I hope it does generate a sequel, but I'm not optimistic about its chances of doing so.
As for OoR, I still have hopes of a sequel (since I fear the boards will not long survive the death of the TSs). Both storylines are (to the best of my knowledge) generally mapped out, although I'm not certain how certain either is to be completed any time soon.
BreadWorldMercy453, on 18 July 2014 - 08:56 AM, said:
Hmm, maybe, but I'm inclined to suspect that simply starting another TS would have a higher chance of generating renewed interest (albeit only temporarily in all probability). I would leave Rasmus, but I don't think it's likely to generate any more activity than it already has.
#10
Posted 23 July 2014 - 07:14 PM
In any case, I'm still curious what caused people to lose interest in the Blazing Trails timeline. Was it the general downturn in activity or were there other factors involved?
#11
Posted 23 July 2014 - 10:27 PM
Wizzy- Disappeared, from the board & both TS timelines
Shorty- Disappeared, from the board & both TS timelines
Nezmy- Disappeared, from the board & both TS timelines
Kat- Told us she was more invested in DM & didn't have time for both
Fiery- Has never stuck around to the end of a TS, I don't think
Me- I don't think I've ever stuck around to the end of a TS either
Tyry- Not sure.
It doesn't seem to be anything personal to the timeline, in my opinion.
#12
Posted 23 July 2014 - 10:35 PM
*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel
#13
Posted 24 July 2014 - 11:08 AM
Avatara, on 23 July 2014 - 10:35 PM, said:
That was probably my fault, I'm pretty sure I remember my character regularly killing ruffians in his backstory. (Maybe I could edit that to be him making up stuff to look cool, I dunno. Sely probably locked it anyway) I really had a different idea of what the intentions of the story were; I knew our characters were supposed to be weaker than the main-timeline characters, but that doesn't say much. I was focusing on keeping the story true-to-the-game, where it's not too hard to take on a group of ruffians even at level 1 or 2. In hindsight, I should have had the ruffians be scary and challenging.
#14
Posted 24 July 2014 - 02:53 PM
*Unless it's Avatara, of course."
-- From the memoirs of Sundered Angel
#16
Posted 26 July 2014 - 06:31 PM
If we do start another TS, who would be willing to participate?
#20
Posted 27 July 2014 - 07:51 PM
You may think it can only work for so long, but that's probably several years in real-time. I thought Retsy would only think she was a magess until the end of Yesterday's Dawn, but...
#23
Posted 04 August 2014 - 06:29 PM
I have at least two people (myself and Sfiera) willing to join the next TS in this timeline, but I'd prefer to have at least three before starting another story. Any eager volunteers (or, at least, people who can be coerced into joining)?
Also, I'm open to suggestions on a storyline for the next story.
#24
Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:08 AM
#25
Posted 24 August 2014 - 02:01 PM