Ambrosia Software Web Board: Woo! - Ambrosia Software Web Board

I'd say ###### rather than bastard.

I'd say..no.

I'd hate to be reading that through somebody else's eyes, because then I'd hate myself.
I can't believe I put a sunglasses emoticon right after the part where he almost got hit by a car.

What kind of insult is "its half the size of a Bible"?

Avatara, on Dec 30 2004, 01:50 AM, said:

She's Jewish, and the Torah (Jewish book of worship), is only the first half of the Bible. It was mainly a play upon her almost fanatical devotion to her own faith and her profound hatred for other religions. A paperback bible alone can inflict massive damage if thrown from a two story height. Although the Torah is technically not identical to the first half of the Christian bible(it has a few less chapters), it is still a formidable literary weapon, especially when wielded by someone who's really, really angry.

Most items can inflict damage if thrown from a two story height.

If you're using paper Bibles as a basis for weapon strength, don't challenge the Mormons. They've got an extra book on you.

I better watch out for whom I insult, don't I? After all, they might be Mormon!
Hey, isn't there a band called 'They Might be Giants?' Well, we are off topic enough already ...

Anaxagoras, on Dec 30 2004, 03:27 AM, said:

I've never gotten why people would say something, then later in that same post say something about how it was bad to say that, or wrong, or otherwise a waste of time. I mean, it's not like you could just go back and delete the previous words before posting if you wanted to get back on topic, right? Especially since you realize it before you hit the submit button, then spend time making a comment on your own words that haven't yet been posted.

Anaxagoras: You're a prick. Shut the hell up, nobody's impressed

lotsofblackflags, on Dec 30 2004, 04:15 AM, said:

I've been working on a program that makes someone else's CD/DVD drive spit out its contents onto the user's bollocks. It's useful for webboards, but it's slow going thus far.

I have no idea how to extract the meaning from what you just said

lotsofblackflags, on Dec 30 2004, 04:49 AM, said:

Reading it might be a step in the right direction.

check.

However, I cannot tell if you are criticising me or him. Or anyone at all.

lotsofblackflags, on Dec 30 2004, 05:36 AM, said:

I'm sorry, but I don't know how to rephrase my post at all. It seems perfectly clear to me. Is there any part in particular that isn't making sense?

Anaxagoras, on Dec 30 2004, 06:48 AM, said:

I wouldn't say 'bastard' I'd say 'single'

Avatara, on Dec 30 2004, 07:50 AM, said:

Well I don't know about you, but I'm hurt just by the thought of it...

lotsofblackflags, on Dec 30 2004, 11:36 AM, said:

Experience has taught me that with Mr Shackles it's generally best to 'assume' he is insulting everyone and anyone.

Lord John Shackles, on Dec 30 2004, 11:40 AM, said:

The words mainly...

Lektor, on Dec 30 2004, 05:49 AM, said:

Whether or not it's the case in a given situation, it's a pretty good course of action

Quote

For clarification, let me say that the initial post was a criticism of Anaxagoras.

Premise: statement not bounded by reality for either setup or actions

Breakdown:
I've been working on a program
Here I'm saying that I've been writing code for a computer application. I haven't actually been working on it, but it's the required setup.

that makes someone else's CD/DVD drive
The computer application I've been writing sends a signal to another computer which causes that other computer to eject its CD or DVD drive. This can't actually happen from my terminal, but it's the required action.

spit out its contents onto the user's bollocks.
The target of the ejecting CD or DVD is the genital region of the user of the other computer.

It's useful for webboards, but it's slow going thus far.
This is the stated application, saying that someone with whom I have already expressed displeasure with what they've written (Anaxagoras) would be the target of my application. The latter part is a lament that it can't actually be done.

For clarification about this post, it was intended as a criticism of everyone having trouble reading my prior post.

Where's dude3 when you need him?

What, for a criticize-off?

oh. Update on toni:

She was here yesterday, and we were fine. We were just friends, and it was good. Well, she tells my homie Josh later on that she dug me again, and she missed me. I felt effin great for about an hour.

So, we go on a walk, and she, my homie Josh, and my friend Kevin start huffing Dustoff (The compressed air used for cleaning computer equiptment. If you inhale it, it ######s you up. Quite fun in small doses). Well, I don't huff anymore, so I kinda let them alone, and go stand away. Toni starts hanging all over Kevin, and won't let go of him. She then tells Josh that she doesn't acually dig me.

That really sucked. I kinda left them for about an hour. I just needed to be alone. Iwent back home, and we hung out in my room for about an hour. I feel effin horrible at this time. I would have done anything to quit feeling at that point. Then Kevin leaves, and I decide that I needed dustoff to forget about myself. So I go in my room, and I take a ridiculous amount. I passed out, and woke up on my floor, under my desk with my left leg soaking wet. I had no idea what was going on. All I knew was that I felt awful.

I try to lie down and get some rest, but I felt like I was dying. My body felt like it was put together wrong. I had a horrible headache, and my breathing was really irregular. I went, in the span of 30 minutes, from wanting a bullet in my head to wanting anything more than to die.

To make a long story short, I got in the hot tub for a while, vomited, talked to my friend angie for a while, and now s###'s good.

###### Toni. I'm not just going to come running every time she gets a feeling ike she might want me back. If she can dcide for sure, I might think about it.

Long post, I apologise. It's just nice to get this s### out in some way.

Lektor, on Dec 30 2004, 05:49 AM, said:

I'd say you're wrong, and I'd be right.

lotsofblackflags said:

I was quite aware when I posted that that no one would be impressed.

However, I despise being called a prick. You can call me whatever the ###### you want, but please, avoid using 'prick.'

You're a prick

lotsofblackflags, on Jan 1 2005, 06:24 AM, said:

Fine.

Oh SNAP.

Anaxagoras, on Jan 1 2005, 09:16 AM, said:

I gotta agree with him. Whether or not you are fine, you're still a prick.

Peer-Pressure is forcing me to agree too.