Chocolate a poll
#1
Posted 15 May 2008 - 02:00 AM
#2
Posted 15 May 2008 - 02:11 AM
#3
Posted 15 May 2008 - 03:24 AM
#4
Posted 15 May 2008 - 03:42 AM
I've found that I'm very rarely able to eat dark chocolate, especially the stronger stuff. White chocolate is my favourite, milk coming a fairly close second.
I generally have to go on price, too cheap and I'm allergic to it, too expensive and I'm allergic to it. So I go for the mid range stuff, like cadbury's mostly. It's usually a case of sticking with what I know...
I wish I could eat any chocolate I wanted, especially chocolate cakes and puddings in restaurants
Ahh well, such is life...
-- Tom Sims
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
#5
Posted 15 May 2008 - 04:11 AM
#6
#7
Posted 15 May 2008 - 10:03 AM
I'm pretty sure white chocolate isn't properly chocolate-it doesn't have any cocoa. That said, it's pretty good.
#9
Posted 15 May 2008 - 11:22 AM
Dark chocolate is rich and luxurious, but again you can't eat too much of it.
Milk chocolate you could eat forever.
So really they all have their ups and downs, I can't say any one is my "favorite."
#10
Posted 15 May 2008 - 11:38 AM
Personally, I prefer either dark chocolate or white chocolate. White chocolate is more of a comfort food; something you have on a cold winter day to warm you up and give you energy. Dark chocolate's a more civilised kind of chocolate, something you savour with your coffee as the dinner party's winding down.
The One and Only
Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy
#11
Posted 15 May 2008 - 02:36 PM
Manta, on May 15 2008, 04:20 AM, said:
Fair enough.
The Journalist, on May 15 2008, 10:03 AM, said:
It has to be at least 20% cocoa butter in the US. Whether or not you want to include it is up to you, but it does have chocolate in the name so it's in the poll.
#13
Posted 15 May 2008 - 05:38 PM
I'll eat a bit of white chocolate every once in a while, but it's typically to just prove to myself that I still don't like it very much. I eat more than a few bits of white chocolate and I start to feel ill.
-Pufer
#14
Posted 15 May 2008 - 08:35 PM
mrxak, on May 15 2008, 12:36 PM, said:
Huh, I did not know this. Makes sense, really.
#15
Posted 16 May 2008 - 12:27 AM
mrxak, on May 15 2008, 07:36 PM, said:
It has to be at least 20% cocoa butter in the US. Whether or not you want to include it is up to you, but it does have chocolate in the name so it's in the poll.
Expanding on that a little;
There are two components which are separated out of cacao beans. Cocoa Butter is the vegetable fat; it's pale yellow, not very strongly flavoured, and useful in a variety of applications. Cocoa Solids, often known simply as Cocoa, is the non-fat component of the beans. It's reddish-brown, rather bitter, and gives the characteristic "chocolate" flavour to chocolate.
White Chocolate, having only Cocoa Butter, thus tastes very different to Milk or Dark Chocolate, which contain both. When you buy chocolate which labels the percentage of cocoa (say, 85%), that usually refers to the total of Cocoa Butter and Cocoa Solids. In the case of high numbers, this means very little milk and sugar, resulting in the characteristic bitterness of high purity chocolates.
The One and Only
Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy
#17
Posted 16 May 2008 - 07:21 PM
SENSES: Foolish intellect! Do you seek to overthrow us, while it is from us that you take your evidence?
#18
Posted 16 May 2008 - 07:35 PM
(x)enos. Awesome in a can. Without the can, though.
#20
Posted 16 May 2008 - 11:37 PM
"I could eat dark chocolate forever, until I died." ?
(x)enos. Awesome in a can. Without the can, though.
#21
Posted 17 May 2008 - 10:38 AM
twitter.com/cippy
gplus.to/cippy
last.fm/user/cippy
Official Pufervian
Messing with Cippy's sig because I can. -mrxak
#22
Posted 17 May 2008 - 11:57 AM
-Thomas Jefferson
#23
Posted 17 May 2008 - 05:26 PM