Finish my Senior Essay for me
#1
Posted 23 April 2007 - 12:43 AM
One paragraph will do; 4-5 sentences, no more than 150 words. Give it a bit of punch; something worthy of finishing 26 measured pages stuffed with 36 carefully chosen citations. Just don't make it too lofty, as the graders at Yale hate pontification.
The One and Only
Ares Webboard Moderator, and all-around Nice Guy
#3
Posted 23 April 2007 - 09:01 AM
#5
Posted 23 April 2007 - 03:12 PM
#6
Posted 23 April 2007 - 03:32 PM
twitter.com/cippy
gplus.to/cippy
last.fm/user/cippy
Official Pufervian
Messing with Cippy's sig because I can. -mrxak
#7
Posted 23 April 2007 - 07:13 PM
#8
Posted 23 April 2007 - 08:28 PM
Jacques Derrida, "Signature Event Context"
#9
Posted 23 April 2007 - 11:07 PM
"However, it seems that this is not an especially strong objection to Hart's view. The idea that there are correct and incorrect decisions in situations ungoverned by rules seems to presuppose the idea that principles are, in fact, applicable to the system. The idea that all court decisions should be just (which is to imply "correct") is not contained in the content of the laws, but is rather a principle that has been attached to the legal system. Just because everyone has been led to believe that the function of the legal system is to judge cases correctly and implement justice, it does not automatically make that the case. Despite the populace's intuitions to the contrary, if the law itself is nothing but the system of primary and secondary rules that Hart asserts that it is, then, principles, including justice, presumably do not enter into it. Now, as Dworkin stated, "we must avoid one tempting confusion" in accepting that "the strong sense of discretion is not tantamount to license." (Dworkin 33) This is to say that simply because legal principles do not exist within the law, it does not mean that criticism cannot be levied against court officials. Being that society at large accepts various legal principles as being true, they certainly have a bearing on the decision a judge may make given a situation where the rules cease to give guidance and he has total discretion in making a ruling. Generally speaking, a judge will likely be averse to being the target of criticism and may well believe in some of the aforementioned principles himself, in which case his decision almost certainly will appeal to some number of principles. Despite the fact that the final result would be indistinguishable between Hart's rule-only system and Dworkin's legal code that contains principles, the influence of principles in making a legal decision for Hart does not necessarily make principles part of the law."
Or:
"Thus and therefore, oh godlike learned peoples of the pen and scroll, I hearby request your acquiescence for my graduating from this fine institution. Do find it in your innately giving hearts to have pity on me for any particular mistakes contained in this document that you may find, for I am but a stranger in your land. I also appeal to your infinite capacity for selfless hospitality in its most pure Derridean form in accepting me, not as an uncredentialed 'other,' but as a proud holder of the label, 'alumnus.' Hear my winged words, oh great ones, and grant me a piece of paper so that I might be able to wear a funny hat and a dress in a couple weeks with my noble and deserving comrades."
Or maybe:
"In closing, stop wasting my time and give me my piece of paper you pompous ######s."
-Pufer
This post has been edited by Pufer: 23 April 2007 - 11:29 PM
#10
Posted 24 April 2007 - 03:52 AM
What's it about? Or don't I want to know?
#11
#13
Posted 25 April 2007 - 12:32 AM
This post has been edited by The Apple Cøre: 25 April 2007 - 01:04 AM
Its like what happens when you cross a phoenix with a super black hole; it's powerful enough to destroy itself, only to be reborn in a vicious cycle of torment and pain. Or in this case, nonsense.
-Avatara, on the life cycle of ATT.
Dude, imagine Redline Trash Talk; the unholy spawn of B&B and ATT.
-ephrin
Will not get involved in a creation/evolution debate.
We're being overrun!
#14
Posted 25 April 2007 - 09:13 PM
my purpose in this universe?
(Answers: 'Cause you are. 'Cause you do. 'Cause I got a
shotgun, and you ain't got one.)
#15
Posted 25 April 2007 - 09:30 PM
Its like what happens when you cross a phoenix with a super black hole; it's powerful enough to destroy itself, only to be reborn in a vicious cycle of torment and pain. Or in this case, nonsense.
-Avatara, on the life cycle of ATT.
Dude, imagine Redline Trash Talk; the unholy spawn of B&B and ATT.
-ephrin
Will not get involved in a creation/evolution debate.
We're being overrun!
#17
Posted 26 April 2007 - 11:55 PM
*apparently firing the lucifer cannon at aliens that attack the human base (and stopping when they either leave or die) is considered luci spamming and will get you vote kicked by the alien team.
my purpose in this universe?
(Answers: 'Cause you are. 'Cause you do. 'Cause I got a
shotgun, and you ain't got one.)
#18
Posted 27 April 2007 - 01:16 AM
#20
Posted 27 April 2007 - 11:33 AM
gray_shirt_ninja, on Apr 27 2007, 12:55 AM, said:
*apparently firing the lucifer cannon at aliens that attack the human base (and stopping when they either leave or die) is considered luci spamming and will get you vote kicked by the alien team.
So your not allowed to kill with the lucifer then?
#21
Posted 27 April 2007 - 01:38 PM
#22
Posted 27 April 2007 - 02:20 PM
Perfect closer right there.
but only if you add this after it:
This post has been edited by wolfman_rec: 27 April 2007 - 02:22 PM