Ambrosia Software Web Board: Ares Chronicles: Ares Strategy: Newt and Sun Tzu on the Art of War and Ares - Ambrosia Software Web Board

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ares Chronicles: Ares Strategy: Newt and Sun Tzu on the Art of War and Ares

#1 User is offline   Newt 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 570
  • Joined: 11-January 00

Posted 16 June 2000 - 09:13 PM

I was looking around for passages from Sun Tzu's The art of War, and I came across some things that I thought were very relevant to Ares strategy, though perhaps not quite relevant enough to warrant posting in the Briefing room. Anyways, here are the passages I felt were most important, followed by my personal explanation of why.

Quote

All warfare is based on deception. Therefore, when capable of attacking, feign incapacity; when active in moving troops, feign inactivity. When near the enemy, make it seem that you are far away; when far away, make it seem that you are near. Hold out baits to lure the enemy. Strike the enemy when he is in disorder. Prepare against the enemy when he is secure at all points. Avoid the enemy for the time being when he is stronger. If your opponent is of choleric temper, try to irritate him. If he is arrogant, try to encourage his egotism. If the enemy troops are well prepared after reorganization, try to wear them down. If they are united, try to sow dissension among them. Attack the enemy where he is unprepared, and appear where you are not expected. These are the keys to victory for a strategist. It is not possible to formulate them in detail beforehand.


This is pretty obvious in my opinion. Strike when he's in disorder? Send a cruiser ahead to confound enemy ships and then move in your main forces. Avoid when he's stronger? Hide in the belts, or near a station. Almost all of these techniques can be accomplished with the use of races like the Salrilians and Cantharans, with their cloaking ships.

Quote

A speedy victory is the main object in war. If this is long in coming, weapons are blunted and morale depressed. If troops are attacking cities, their strength will be exhausted. When the army engages in protracted campaigns, the resources of the state will fall short. When your weapons are dulled and ardor dampened, your strength exhausted and treasure spent, the chieftains of the neighboring states will take advantage of your crisis to act. In that case, no man, however wise, will be able to avert the disastrous consequences that ensue. Thus, while we have heard of stupid haste in war, we have not yet seen a clever operation that was prolonged. for there has never been a protracted war which benefited a country. Therefore, those unable to understand the evils inherent in employing troops are equally unable to understand the advantageous ways of doing so.  


Always finish off your enemy at the first chance you get; if he's able to hide out and build up a force again, you are left with a number of ships which are weakened from the previous fighting. Additionally, if you allow yourself to get frustrated, then you might find yourself playing worse just wanting the damn game to end. Finish it fast.

Quote

Generally, in war the best policy is to take a state intact; to ruin it is inferior to this. To capture the enemy's entire army is better than to destroy it; to take intact a regiment, a company, or a squad is better than to destroy them. For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence.

Thus, those skilled in war subdue the enemy's army without battle. They capture the enemy's cities without assaulting them and overthrow his state without protracted operations. Their aim is to take all under heaven intact by strategic considerations. Thus, their troops are not worn out and their gains will be complete. This is the art of offensive strategy.  


As of now, you can't take over ships. When hera come out, I'm sure many will see the use of making ships capturable, but until then the part about subduing without battle holds true. Transports, anyone? Draw your opponent out with an attack on an ATR, or simply attack him when your transport is near to confound him and give it time to land. This will keep your losses low. In missions with multiple planets, this holds especially true.

Quote

Thus, there are five points in which victory may be predicted:
1. He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious.
2. He who understands how to fight in accordance with the strength of antagonistic forces will be victorious.
3. He whose ranks are united in purpose will be victorious.
4. He who is well prepared and lies in wait for an enemy who is not well prepared will be victorious.
5. He whose generals are able and not interfered with by the sovereign will be victorious.


Well, there you go. Match ships with what they're good at killing. If your opponent builds nothing but carriers, build ships which work well at killing carriers (note: Do NOT attempt this with Ishimans, the best you can hope for is to match you opponent's strategy if he builds the 2 carriers.) Cruisers will swarm gunships. carriers toast cruisers. As for united ranks, target your enemies, not yourself. As for the general stuff, just imagine that there are actual people on your ship or something, although it could be interpreted as advice not to leave ships at planets and bunker stations.

Quote

If I am able to determine the enemy's dispositions while, at the same time, I conceal my own, then I can concentrate my forces and his must be divided. And if I concentrate while he divides, I can use my entire strength to attack a fraction of his. Therefore, I will be numerically superior. Then, if I am able to use many to strike few at the selected point, those I deal with will fall into hopeless straits. The enemy must not know where I intend to give battle. For if he does not know where I intend to give battle, he must prepare in a great many places. And when he prepares in a great many places, those I have to fight in will be few.


If you are a cloaking species, you can easily concentrate, especially if your enemy moves in more directions at once. If they attempt to take 2 bunkers, move in on their planet. Even if you can’t cloak, you can hide in the belts and only give a vague idea of where you are to your enemies.

Quote

Therefore, both advantage and danger are inherent in maneuvering for an advantageous position. One who sets the entire army in moriton with impediments to pursue an advantageous position will not attain it. If he abandons the camp and all the impediments to contend for advantage, the stores will be lost. Thus, if one orders his men to make forced marches without armor, stopping neithe day nor night, covering double the usual distance at a stretch, and doing a hundred li to wrest an advantage, it is probable that the commanders will be captured. The stronger men will arrive first and the feeble ones will struggle along behind


There you go. Don’t just blindly rush forth. Humans especially suffer from this. If you attack, just telling all your ships to attack the target, you will end up regretting it. Your HVD arrives first, with your gunships lagging, and the confusion in your fleet will likely lead to your loss of the game.

And there you have it. The thousands of years old wisdom of Sun Tzu applied to Ares. Holds up pretty well, in my experience. Any comments?
So I don't feel alone, or the weight of the stone,
Now that I've found somewhere safe To bury my bones.
And any fool knows a dog needs a home,
A shelter from pigs on the wing.
-Pink Floyd, Pigs on the Wing (pt. 2)

#2 User is offline   Captain Carnotaur 

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,944
  • Joined: 25-May 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 June 2000 - 10:38 AM

WOW! The stratagy Sun Tzu explained really is relevant with Ares! Who would have thought that a guy thousands of years ago explained some stratagy that applies to a computer game! Listen to this stratagy people, it works!

------------------

#3 User is offline   Sargatanus 

  • Haruspex
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1,443
  • Joined: 21-April 00
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minneapolis MN

Posted 22 June 2000 - 11:09 AM

Of course it works. War, no matter how technologically advanced it gets, follows a universal rythim (sp?). Sun Tzu, a brilliant strategist and philosopher, understood this and worked out the elements of winning. The tactics works just as well for space combat as they do for ancient blade-to-blade melees. I read The Art of War about three years ago and have applied to any strategy game since. Bravo Newt!

BTW, in eastern culture the Art of War is applied to anything having to do with competition such as business, diplomacy, etc. I suggest that everyone here read it.

------------------
Throughout their history these "unenlightened" beings have continually opposed and fought abuses of power wrought by their own bretheren. We, as the prophets would do well to learn from these Humans.
-Final statement of the Salrilian reformist Sirthis shortly before his execution.
4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L

Shameless advertisement

#4 User is offline   Captain Carnotaur 

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,944
  • Joined: 25-May 00
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 June 2000 - 05:18 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Sargatanus:
...War, no matter how technologically advanced it gets, follows a universal rythim (sp?). Sun Tzu, a brilliant strategist and philosopher, understood this and worked out the elements of winning. The tactics works just as well for space combat as they do for ancient blade-to-blade melees...


I agree with you absolutely on this.

------------------

#5 User is offline   Newt 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 570
  • Joined: 11-January 00

Posted 22 June 2000 - 08:27 PM

Actually, this was all very relevant to strategy games, because while I knew who Sun Tzu was (roughly,) and that he wrote the book and everything, I didn't know a thing that was in it until I saw that cutscene from Alpha Centuari, for the Hunter Seek Algorithm, and I though, hey! That applies to Ares. I wonder if anything else does? So I tracked down the passages, and voila. Anyways, I'm probably going to try and find an actual copy of the book now.

------------------
We woke up one morning and fell a little further down, for sure this is the valley of death.
I open up my wallet, and it is full of blood.
-Godspeed you Black Emporer!, Dead flag blues
So I don't feel alone, or the weight of the stone,
Now that I've found somewhere safe To bury my bones.
And any fool knows a dog needs a home,
A shelter from pigs on the wing.
-Pink Floyd, Pigs on the Wing (pt. 2)

#6 User is offline   Pallas Athene 

  • Lame space monkey
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,636
  • Joined: 27-February 00
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Omisha

Posted 29 June 2000 - 08:00 PM

This is really quite relevant in one level, but surprisingly, not in my strategy; in the early level where Flak Drones first appear, the most effective way to sneak your engineering pod in, I've found, is to take 10/20 cruisers and hyper them around the base, thereby distracting the enemy. My strategy, however, is to gain ground slowly, and not lose it. I don't strike quickly.

------------------
"If so, then how does one count to 10 on the Mac?"
"128, 127, 126, 125..."
-Pallas Athene, Member of the Obish Consensus

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users