Montpelier, VT It's the best town in the world.
#27
Posted 11 April 2007 - 11:22 PM
moonunit4eva, on Apr 11 2007, 11:25 PM, said:
Aww, I appreciate you looking out for me and my topic.
Jacques Derrida, "Signature Event Context"
#29
Posted 12 April 2007 - 12:04 AM
Mackilroy, on Apr 9 2007, 10:14 PM, said:
Granted, all of New England is tiny and inferior to the West Coast, but that's okay.
It's concentrated awesome. Sure beats your shallow and vain existence on the left coast.
dude3, on Apr 10 2007, 01:20 AM, said:
Victoria is a fun place, though it's too touristy to compete with Montpelier.
Charmless? What do you want, a quaint little suburb? It's a city of culture, history, and good ######ing food.
As for the subways, they work just fine. It's public transport, not a limo service.
#30
Posted 12 April 2007 - 10:44 PM
mrxak, on Apr 12 2007, 01:04 AM, said:
Somebody should tell San Francisco, Montreal, London, and New York City. They must've missed that memo that said public transit should run like a Disneyland ride.
Jacques Derrida, "Signature Event Context"
#31
Posted 13 April 2007 - 02:55 PM
#32
Posted 13 April 2007 - 03:42 PM
dude3, on Apr 12 2007, 09:44 PM, said:
And Chicago. Bumpiest subway I've ever been on.
>.>
#33
Posted 13 April 2007 - 09:14 PM
mrxak, on Apr 13 2007, 12:55 PM, said:
I think you're talking to dude3 here but here's my take:
I have, as a tourist, used the subways/light rails of DC, Boston, New York, San Francisco, Chicago. While Chicago's isn't exactly awesome, I have to say, they all put Boston's to shame. In all fairness, that was a few years ago, and I've heard that it's gotten rather better since they introduced and worked some of the kinks out of the CharlieCard, so maybe I need to make another trip there. The fact that it's something like 120 years old also gives it some leeway.
Did I mention that in each of these cities, I spent a least 2 days joyriding the transit system? I'm rather obcessive about transit systems.
#35
Posted 14 April 2007 - 12:44 AM
wolfman_rec, on Apr 13 2007, 03:42 PM, said:
I didn't really like Chicago's, either. DC was much better.
#36
Posted 14 April 2007 - 01:12 PM
moonunit4eva, on Apr 13 2007, 07:37 PM, said:
Reading is fun. Maps are fun. Subways are fun.
Where's the problem here?
#39
Posted 14 April 2007 - 04:36 PM
moonunit4eva, on Apr 14 2007, 11:15 AM, said:
I actually read a book about that...well, kind of, it was about a guy who step into another dimension or something on the London Underground..
#41
Posted 15 April 2007 - 12:29 AM
-Pufer
#42
Posted 15 April 2007 - 02:36 AM
The Journalist, on Apr 14 2007, 05:36 PM, said:
You mean Harry Potter?
Jacques Derrida, "Signature Event Context"
#44
Posted 15 April 2007 - 06:20 AM
-- Tom Sims
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
#45
Posted 15 April 2007 - 01:22 PM
Its like what happens when you cross a phoenix with a super black hole; it's powerful enough to destroy itself, only to be reborn in a vicious cycle of torment and pain. Or in this case, nonsense.
-Avatara, on the life cycle of ATT.
Dude, imagine Redline Trash Talk; the unholy spawn of B&B and ATT.
-ephrin
Will not get involved in a creation/evolution debate.
We're being overrun!
#47
Posted 16 April 2007 - 12:06 AM
Lektor, on Apr 15 2007, 04:20 AM, said:
He does indeed ride the Underground; he uses it to get to the building that has the passage into Diagon Alley for the first time. It's early-ish in the first book.