Fullerenes as weapons?
#26
Posted 02 April 2000 - 01:50 PM
About magnetic and superconductive matters: didn't I mention earlier that Fullerenes are superconductive and magnetic?!? I did so there you have it, a matter that is both magnetic and superc.
Matter shield would really require energy all the time, but in Ares the shields only use energy to recharge. So they cannot be mattershields controlled with magnets (unless you have superc. magnets, which is quite hard to make and keep working, it would also mean that the ships would be made out of fullerenefabric or some other superc./magnetic matter). Theoretically that is.
But in SW they use proton- (ionised hydrogen) shields, and protons could be controlled just by energizing the ships hull with electrons and due to superc. hull plating the protons cannot receive electrons and so the protons and electrons will stay in wanted place. Not sure if it is possible though but that's just a theory too.
Or they could be just an electron field controlled by ionized hull plating.
The shields could also be like a stationary warpfield that starts to work when sothing hits it.
Mind me but this conversation is getting more and more interesting every time someone sends their theories in here. And I think that soon I won't be able to think up anything !! HMPH… that really starts to bug me: black Q-marks on a black background!!
I have my English exam tomorrow! Let's see how good grades I get…
------------------
Strange… just a moment ago I was flying through a dense asteroid field… but now I feel quite cold… And just what happened to my
H-Cruiser?!?
#27
Posted 02 April 2000 - 06:39 PM
Vaporizing water also requires an outside force: Um..... Sunlight!
I'm not saying that those are the only things that can evaporate/vaporize water, but that they mean the same thing.
Sunlight is an outside force.
------------------
In accepting the inevitable, one finds peace.
In denying it, one finds hope.
-Last words of Admiral Williams before the fall of Earth.
#28
Posted 02 April 2000 - 07:19 PM
Quote
The Facts...
If you drop a buttered piece of bread, it will fall on the floor butter-side down. If a cat is dropped from a window or other high and towering place, it will land on it's feet.
The Problem Statement...
But what if you attach a buttered piece of bread, butter-side up to a cat's back and toss them both out the window? Will the cat land on it's feet? Or will the butter splat on the ground?
The answer...
Even if you are too lazy to do the experiment yourself you should be able to deduce the obvious result. The laws of butterology demand that the butter must hit the ground, and the equally strict laws of
feline aerodynamics demand that the cat can not smash its furry back. If the combined construct were to land, nature would have no way to resolve this paradox. Therefore it simply does not fall.
That's right you clever mortal (well, as clever as a mortal can get), you have discovered the secret of antigravity! A buttered cat will, when released, quickly move to a height where the forces of cat-twisting
and butter repulsion are in equilibrium. This equilibrium point can be modified by scraping off some of the butter, providing lift, or removing some of the cat's limbs, allowing descent.
Most of the civilized species of the Universe already use this principle to drive their ships while within a planetary system. The loud humming heard by most sighters of UFOs is, in fact, the purring of
several hundred tabbies.
The one obvious danger is, of course, if the cats manage to eat the bread off their backs they will instantly plummet. Of course the cats will land on their feet, but this usually doesn't do them much good,
since right after they make their graceful landing several tons of red-hot starship and ticked off aliens crash on top of them.
Any opinions?
------------------
In accepting the inevitable, one finds peace.
In denying it, one finds hope.
-Last words of Admiral Williams before the fall of Earth.
#29
Posted 03 April 2000 - 06:21 AM
Are you sure you posted that to the right place, or is it just supposed to draw our attention?
Well, anyway we have drifted from fullerene weapons to shields and I guess that next we probably will be writing about Murphy's laws and how they can be adapted to Ares… I hope not.
------------------
Strange… just a moment ago I was flying through a dense asteroid field… but now I feel quite cold… And just what happened to my
H-Cruiser?!?
#30
Posted 04 April 2000 - 11:49 AM
I just happened to see the Eraser on TV and it reminded me about those nice little railguns, so I checked the I-Net and found interesting things… I think I'll make myself a little coilgun
------------------
Strange… just a moment ago I was flying through a dense asteroid field… but now I feel quite cold… And just what happened to my
H-Cruiser?!?
#32 Guest_GarbageMan_*
Posted 05 April 2000 - 07:57 PM
------------------
#33 Guest_Admiral Sargatanus_*
Posted 06 April 2000 - 06:50 PM
One more thing. Quantum energy and ZP energy are the exact same thing. And as I said, if you could exclude an atom from the weak nuclear force, it implodes and converts it's entire mass into energy. I also said that some Finn may have discovered (or glimpsed anyway) a way to do this.
Anyway, what I've been wondering is what is a chronon particle? You know, the things the Sal gunships and HVDs have?
------------------
"…Throught their history, these 'unenlightened' beings have continually organized to opposed the injustices and attrocities committed by their bretheran in power. We, as the prophets, would do well to learn from these humans."
-Final statement of Salrilian reformist Sirthis before his execution.
#34
Posted 07 April 2000 - 09:04 AM
Theory
The theory behind the railgun is not overly difficult. It revolves around the simple equation: F=ILXB. The F stands for the force which will be acting on the bullet, the B is the magnetic
field the current through the rods (rails) and bullet will produce and L is the length between the rods. Using the 'right hand rule' one can see that the force, will push the bullet along the
rails and out the end of the 'gun'. Below is a crude example of how it will all work.
I -->
----------------------------------------- conducting rod (rail)
X X X X | | | |
B field | | |<-- Bullet L
X X X X | / | |
----------------------------------------- conducting rod (rail)
I <--
The velocity of the bullet goes as:
L'*i^2*t L' is the inductance of the rods
v = ------ i is current, t is durration of current pulse
2*m m is mass of the 'bullet'
Obviously, increasing the current is the best way to go about increasing the velocity of the bullet. We also decided to get some rare earth magnets to get some 'free' magnetic field to help
The Coilguns do use e-magnets to propel the projectile (infact those particle accelerators use the same method to propel particles) If I could get the stuff needed for making a coilgun I would make one .
------------------
Strange… just a moment ago I was flying through a dense asteroid field… but now I feel quite cold… And just what happened to my
H-Cruiser?!?
#35
Posted 07 April 2000 - 06:47 PM
I went there once, but quite frankly I don't care for being accelerated to 90mph, pushed 180ft. (straight up), and doing it again backwards before getting off.
-Ensign Slug
------------------
In accepting the inevitable, one finds peace.
In denying it, one finds hope.
-Last words of Admiral Williams before the fall of Earth.
#36
Posted 08 April 2000 - 07:41 PM
It was nice
------------------
In accepting the inevitable, one finds peace.
In denying it, one finds hope.
-Last words of Admiral Williams before the fall of Earth.
#37
Posted 11 April 2000 - 09:11 AM
That Linnanmäki means roughly castlehill.
By the way… how many of you thinks that there are polarbears in Finland?
How many of you thinks that there is snow here even in summer, or that here's always dark, or other things like that, or did you probably think that Finland is possibly a state in USA, or in Siberia (or somewhere in Russia)??
Really… just curious (and it's part of my schoolwork too [about other cultures]).
------------------
Strange… just a moment ago I was flying through a dense asteroid field… but now I feel quite cold… And just what happened to my
H-Cruiser?!?
#38 Guest_InasaPulse_*
Posted 11 April 2000 - 05:19 PM
#39
Posted 29 April 2000 - 11:02 AM
For purely electronic shielding:
A ship could be equipped with energy projectors. Two could create a focal point of increased energy, and reversing the reaction used to create energy from the sun, energy could be transformed into a small amount of unstable matter. The matter would collide with an incoming object, and the object would be destroyed from collision. Any amount of the matter created would quickly decay, and there would only be small traces of the original reaction.
But I'm not even into high school, so if any of you can refine/brutally strike down this theory, I'll be thankful.
------------------
Once caalaklael, now Pallas Athene
---
Athena, daughter and favorite of Zeus, half sister of Ares, goddess of wisdom and war
#40
Posted 30 April 2000 - 08:49 PM
Quote
But I'm not even into high school, so if any of you can refine/brutally strike down this theory, I'll be thankful.
Your wish is my command...
Quote
A ship could be equipped with energy projectors.
Huh? Energy is transferred from matter to matter, not projected. ENERGY IS NOT A PHYSICAL THING.
Quote
Two could create a focal point of increased energy, and reversing the reaction used to create energy from the sun...
A bunch of obtuse buzzwords. A "focal point of increased energy" would not reverse a fusion reaction. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Quote
energy could be transformed into a small amount of unstable matter.
This would use massive amounts of energy to create a few atoms of mere hydrogen and anti-hydrogen. These would immediately collide and cancel each other out (the correct term is M/A annihilation) and you'd end up with what you started with : energy. Also, only a small amount (say ((3^x)÷tanx^2-(sin(x^2)-cos(x^2)))) of the matter would be unstable. That's mere electrons/positrons in relation to the whole mass created.
Quote
The matter would collide with an incoming object, and the object would be destroyed from collision.
If an ICBM warhead can fly into outer-space, turn around, and survive re-entry through one of the thickest atmospheres in the solar system, I hardly think that a few hydrogen atoms would destroy a packet of fullerene. And because there would be an M/A Annihilation going on (producing 'spiral' energy as the boys down at Stanford call it (I've been to the particle accelerator there, neat piece of equipment)), the projectile would most likely be accelerated towards it's target!
Quote
I'm probably making up physics here...
You are, but you are better than the average High School duh (I should know, because I go to College Park High).
------------------
Would you like to ride on your own ass?
-Advertisement for donkey rides in Thailand
#41
Posted 02 May 2000 - 01:35 PM
To the point:
Energy is a pretty abstract word, just because there's so many types of energy, e.g. movement, being more precise would not hurt when using that word. Ofcourse one can focuse electrons to a certain point (but if there's enough of them nothing can keep them put) and that's what the T-Space Bolt Rod is all about (a giant tesla… DUHH!!).
Damn… I forgot what I was about to write DUHH!!!!
Well later then…
I don't know much about science, don't know much chemistry (don't know how the song really goes but who cares)… and so on… well I really don't know much, but I am really interested in things and that's why I try to find out about things and learn.
------------------
Strange… just a moment ago I was flying through a dense asteroid field… but now I feel quite cold… And just what happened to my
H-Cruiser?!?
#42 Guest_Nak'Goek_*
Posted 02 May 2000 - 04:55 PM
#43
Posted 03 May 2000 - 02:03 PM
------------------
Throughout their history these "unenlightened" beings have continually opposed and fought abuses of power wrought by their own bretheren. We, as the prophets would do well to learn from these Humans.
-Final statement of the Salrilian reformist Sirthis shortly before his execution.
#45
Posted 04 May 2000 - 04:53 PM
/
| |
I| Pull back on this piece,
| |
/
(|
|
| | <--release this part here
|/
(|
/
| |
|| When this part hits you, it stings.
| |
/
Try this on someone! It's fun!
------------------
Once caalaklael, now Pallas Athene
---
Athena, daughter and favorite of Zeus, half sister of Ares, goddess of wisdom and war
#48 Guest_Schrodinger's Cat_*
Posted 09 May 2000 - 06:18 PM
A chronon is completely fictional, but whoever said it interacts differently with space/time is probably on the right track. Skewing the value of Plank's constant in a small area (completely impossible, even in theory, but probably would work on the same principle as the FTL warp drive so beloved of Ares fans) could fry things. If the energy from a fusion power plant was suddenly quantized into huge packets...BOOM!